FORUM
EXPO
AWARDS
Latest News
Contact Us
FAQ
PACKWINE DESIGN AWARDS
2022 JUDGING FORM
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Category: Best Classic Format Package Design
This award acknowledges classic format design.
Category: Best Alternative Format Package Design
This award acknowledges alternative format package design. Examples include: canned wines, single serve, bag in box, plastic, large format, etc.
Category: Best Luxury Package Design
This award acknowledges packaging formats that retail for $100 and higher at a 750ml equivalent, whose packages are designed to compete and succeed on high-end restaurant wine lists and in fine wine shops against luxury wines from around the world.
Category: Best Package Redesign
This award recognises former package along with the redesigned package (2 bottles total). The redesign must have been commercially available in 2020-2021.
Category: Best Package Series Design
This award recognises Package Series Design consisting of two or more wine packages that work together as a cohesive whole.
Category: Best Presentation & Gift Pack Design
This award acknowledges gift packs, holiday sets, wooden boxes, subscription packs, wine club packs and presentation cases.
Judging Criteria
1. Judges to assess and score each of the below four criteria out of 10.
2. Judges to provide a final overall comment of the nomination assessing the quality of the application, considering the whole application and its cumulative scores. This comment may be used for media purposes.
The judges will consider the following with reference to each nomination:
• The visual appeal
• The design functionality
• Appropriateness for the price segment
• Creative utilisation of the classic packaging
Entry: 2022 Judging Form
The visual appeal
Selected Value:
0
Very Poor = 0 | Poor = 3 | Not Good = 4 | Satisfactory = 5 | Good = 6 | Great = 7 | Outstanding = 10
The design functionality
Selected Value:
0
Very Poor = 0 | Poor = 3 | Not Good = 4 | Satisfactory = 5 | Good = 6 | Great = 7 | Outstanding = 10
Appropriateness for the price segment
Selected Value:
0
Very Poor = 0 | Poor = 3 | Not Good = 4 | Satisfactory = 5 | Good = 6 | Great = 7 | Outstanding = 10
Quality of packaging materials used
Selected Value:
0
Very Poor = 0 | Poor = 3 | Not Good = 4 | Satisfactory = 5 | Good = 6 | Great = 7 | Outstanding = 10
Overall comment of the quality of the nomination (this may be published or used for media purposes).
Submit
TOP
